Rubik's Clock
PlaceResultNameQuoteDate
16.26 secondsEdwin de MenezesI had solved it in 14 secs in 1991 and 12.66 secs in 1996 and now its 6.26 secs.20080801
26.56 secondsMátyás KutiNot lucky, just easy case.
Check out the video
20070108
36.84 secondsMatthew RudnickiReally awesome solve. I got two lucky clocks, but overall was just a really fast solve. Turning was fast and super accurate. I'm really pumped right now.20080516
46.91 secondsDerrick EideWow! Wow! I didn't expect this time for me!
sub 7 yah! :)
20061027
57.53 secondsDavid Pemberton2 clocks skipped, my order exploits easy faces so I get lucky often.woot!20071112
67.55 secondsShota KobayashiGood!20080818
77.56 secondsTaki Sugimoton/a20080708
87.97 secondsSander HendrickxI think around 8 seconds is more or less the limit. skipping 1 (or maybe 2) steps isn't considered lucky because it happens quite a lot with the clock (and trying to exploit lucky cases gives you bad bad times :-s) Cheers Stefan :-)
My method
20060108
98.14 secondsStefan PochmannI wish I could do this all the time. I'm not even safe below 10 but most solves are below 11 now.20040805
108.35 secondsStijn van Gilsmy first non-lucky sub-9. and a pretty fast one
thanks to Sander, using his method
20051206
118.55 secondsGunnar KrigIt was very fluid, but I think I can do low-7 with a perfect solve.20050609
128.74 secondsErik AkkersdijkFrom my 10.53 avg. A realy good solve.20061011
138.98 secondsDan Gosbee17 years after i bought my first one, I can still hit under 10 seconds everytime!!!. A really good feeling. 
149.85 secondsCameron YeohOnce you know how to do it, it is really easy. Practice makes you quicker! 
159.87 secondsBoris KonradThere it is! Sub10! YES :)
SpeedStacks Timer, lubed Clock, Stefans system (thanks!)
20060305
1610.31 secondsJoseph LiaoRubik's Clock is addicting! Thanks to Stefan's site, don't forget to visit mine ;) My site. 
1710.61 secondsDan CohenVery easy.20080304
1810.64 secondsWim Lambrechtsclose to sub-10 now20060622
1910.81 secondsBob BurtonThere is still room for improvement. Visit my site.20060602
2010.98 secondsFumiki Kosekinext sub 10.20061217
2111.23 secondsThomas BischofI know I've had at least one sub-10, but I of course forgot to record it. Had this puzzle for a few weeks now.20040814
2211.67 secondsBen PicoloThat brings me to top 10, eh :)20051021
2311.93 secondsLucas GarronGot fast today. Completely non-lucky solve, just very smooth.20071112
2411.99 secondsAnssi Vanhalan/a20060417
2512 secondsJasmine LeeI was really excited when this puzzle came out, but I quickly realised that in no way could it live up to The Cube. It's definitely much easier than it looks. Having said this, I couldn't do 12 secs now, I set this time ages ago when the puzzle first came out. Haven't touched a Clock in years. 
2612.22 secondsHadley SheffieldHope to have times like this at nationals!20080508
2712.33 secondsPedro CamposI had this bet with a friend; he told me I couldn't do it below 13s his rubik's clock. Did it :) I don't think I'll practice to get a faster solve (perhaps BF it some day), I also have a sub30 cube solve bet going on ;) 
2813.12 secondsThom BarlowI'm aiming for sub-10 here. Doesn't look that far off, either.20050908
2913.56 secondsTobias DaneelsThanks to stijn for teaching me.20051201
3013.73 secondsCraig BouchardWhen I get into this mode, all my puzzles just start getting good times, and I break a lot of PBs.20051121
3114.37 secondsThomas Le RouxMy first sub-15.20060927
3214.63 secondsMichael GottliebNot lucky, but this is fast for me.20070205
3314.80 secondsGilles van den Peereboomn/a20050905
3414.90 secondsCharlie Cooperi need a smooth turning clock!20071112
3515.15 secondsJoe WallaceI'm pretty pleased with this.20060313
3616.06 secondsTim SunBest non-lucky solve of my best average.20060526
3716.08 secondsTristan WrightVery satisfied with this time, hope to soon get under 15 seconds.20060512
3816.59 secondsEmanuele ScibiliaNot a good result, I know. But I have a lot to improve. I have to practice more. :P The Italian Rubik's cube group20071201
3916.72 secondsJacco KrijnenA little bit lucky. 2 clocks skipped.20080224
4017.44 secondsKelley Reynoldsn/a 
4118.02 secondsBen LuoStill getting used to Stefan Pochmann's method.20060418
4219.97 secondsSean ConnollyA pretty good solve. By no means lucky, but I was able to set 3 clocks on the cross with my opening move. My clock turns nice & smoothly, and by the way, Dan Harris, YOU'RE NOT HAVING MY CLOCK! ;-) Oh maybe if you want to borrow it on DCD'05 but I must have it back!!! Who is 'Absolute' and who is 'Obsolete' anyway? Me, I'm just plain confused! ;-)20051013
4320.00 secondsZebadiah W. ZiegenbeinI got this puzzle just this weekend in the mail, i bought it off ebay for 2.99 and it came with the box and instructions. And it was only a state away!! This was pretty good since i have only had it like 3 days. And when i opened it with in 5 minutes of opening it, it was sovled. Now i just have to do a lot of practice on looking ahead at the other clocks and having a faster mind for this puzzle. And it moves pretty good too.20060424
4426.46 secondsBen WhitmoreMy first sub 30 seconds20080808
4527 secondsRune ZedelerCannot go any faster than this. :-( Still thinks it pretty fast, though. Far too easy for a Rubik's puzzle. 
4627.01 secondsDan HarrisI want Sean Connolly's Clock. Cubestation.co.uk. [Obsolete Team member with Stefan]20050718
4730.54 secondsThomas ClementBleh, getting better. Not quickly though.20060525
4831.65 secondsOuyang Yunqin/a20080531
4932.32 secondsTon DennenbroekJust tried 5 times 
5035.57 secondsMikael Vanhalan/a20060417
5146.08 secondsJosh RotholzNot bad for my 10th ever solve ) I love this puzzle.20080503
5247 secondsJeroen Hörterseasy puzzle20071015
532 minutes 36.74 secondsPatrick Jamesoni beat my record by like a minute.20070217
542 minutes 53 secondsJames WattJust got it in the Mail today awesome little puzzle.
I will keep at it and get faster I hope.
Jarhead Cubing
20060316
554 minutesJason GrochmalBest I can do with my technique.