Rubik's Clock (Average of 10)
PlaceResultNameQuoteDate
18.63 secondsMátyás Kuti09.14 09.36 (09.67) 08.89 08.62 07.86 08.19 07.48 (06.80) 08.45 09.12 09.19
New method -> Better times
Best avg. of 5: 7.84
20061007
29.73 secondsSander Hendrickx9.27 9.42 9.39 (7.97) (10.94) 9.83 10.00 9.80 9.14 10.31 10.25 9.89
Thanks to Stefan for inspiration ;-)
My method
20060108
39.80 secondsDavid Pemberton10.24 (10.58) 09.57 09.55 10.05 09.79 09.98 09.55 10.45 (09.15) 09.26 09.53
Now let's do that in comp :)
20070509
49.89 secondsStefan Pochmann9.21 10.10 9.09 9.41 10.59 9.56 10.84 9.18 11.17 9.77 (12.33) (8.61)
Done with my stackmat and random initial button states. My method is online.
20040801
510.53 secondsErik Akkersdijk10.41 9.88 11.19 10.05 10.25 11.48 11.61 10.69 (12.34) (8.74) 10.16 9.61
Wow!! closer to sub-10 practising all puzzles a bit before DO.
20061011
610.90 secondsShota Kobayashi10.33 11.97 12.25 11.11 (9.45) 10.23 11.88 10.53 (15.36) 9.56 10.78 10.33
My site
20080815
711.25 secondsStijn van Gils12.99 9.99 (9.17) 10.92 (13.25) 9.39 12.56 9.56 12.14 11.67 12.24 11.08
that brings me in the top-3 ;)
Thanks to Sander, using his method
20051204
811.33 secondsGunnar Krig9.14 10.31 9.64 13.00 12.89 (8.55) 12.11 10.69 (14.73) 11.94 12.45 11.1220050609
912.02 secondsBoris Konrad11.46 12.78 11.50 13.03 11.93 (13.72) 11.65 (10.58) 12.81 11.49 12.12 11.45
Used SpeedStacks Timer, lubed clock, done with Stefans system and advice (thanks!)
20060305
1013.73 secondsFumiki Koseki15.06 13.27 (12.00) 12.76 (15.59) 13.22
12.50 13.35 13.93 15.22 14.44 13.53
20061217
1113.85 secondsThomas Bischof12.54 15.92 13.04 16.64 14.21 15.82 (11.23) 16.32 (18.09) 12.28 13.10 11.68
Definitely could have done better, but I'm not complaining about the times.
 
1214.10 secondsLucas Garron13.06 (11.85) 14.02 15.44 13.49 (16.40) 15.79 15.15 13.28 12.59 15.14 13.04
Didn't think I'd get so fast so soon.
20071112
1314.34 secondsDan Cohen12.94 15.86 14.91 13.86 (DNF) 16.91 16.66 13.59 (10.61) 12.77 13.38 12.53
The DNF was 1 turn off. It was my worst time though.
20080304
1414.78 secondsAnssi VanhalaMy first sub-15.20060421
1515.06 secondsBob Burton13.33 (18.99) 16.02 16.57 14.57 17.04 14.74 12.43 16.42 14.04 15.48 (10.81)
There is still room for improvement. Visit my site.
20060602
1615.58 secondsIsiah Planesplay around with it.
no solutions or tips.
just plain brain.
20080514
1717.21 secondsBen Picolo19.89 17.31 16.31 19.85 16.50 15.43 16.86 17.29 (23.32) 17.37 (13.61) 15.89
I'm coming, Stefan :D
20051001
1817.24 secondsTristan Wright18.33 (16.80) 18.09 19.59 (24.56) 17.43 19.68 19.33 21.78 17.19 20.97
As usual my average contains my best single solve, very satisfied with this average.
20060512
1917.92 secondsPer Kristen Fredlund=(14.69) 20.33 20.7 15.13 17.8 18.05 19.28 17.2 17.95 (21.02) 17.03 15.69
Ok, so i decided i need some practice on this otherwise boring puzzle. Lol. Not too bad for my first attempt. I will practice a little more the coming weeks :-)
20051005
2018.55 secondsTimothy Sun19.24 (22.57) (15.80) 18.02 21.48 17.88 20.66 17.86 18.81 16.06 16.39 19.10
I've had the clock like three days so far. :/ 15.8 was lucky but who cares it doesn't count. :P
20060526
2118.98 secondsCraig BouchardWell, as many people proved to me at WC, my CLOCK SUX!!! Stefan, your clock is amazing, anyone could set WRs on it.20051121
2219.59 secondsGilles van den Peereboom(10.34) (21.75) 20.37 17.89 19.91 16.00 19.47 18.99 21.74 20.64 19.79 21.14
10.34 was lucky. Hopefully I keep progressing like this :-)
20050905
2322.20 secondsJoe WallaceMy clock is so annoying20060516
2423.27 secondsEmanuele Scibilia18.42 23.39 (27.29) 24.07 22.96 25.08 24.65 (16.59) 23.07 24.22 21.64 25.21. I don't like to do averages with this puzzle. Anyway this was my second average. I have to learn better the method. The Italian Rubik's cube group20071201
2538.50 secondsOuyang Yunqin/a20080531