| Square-1 (Average of 10) |
| Place | Result | Name | Quote | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14.90 seconds | Kazuhito Iimura | (11.11) 14.27 (20.51 )14.61 18.56 12.41 13.62 13.19 13.76 19.94 14.73 13.95 Good! | 20080808 |
| 2 | 20.13 seconds | Grzegorz Prusak | [18.50 16.75 22.68 21.52 (24.53) 20.59 21.91 15.65 20.00 23.52 (15.52) 20.15] one of 15.xx was LC | 20080511 |
| 3 | 20.51 seconds | Martin Zahradník | 21.63 16.63 22.38 (35.38) 26.63 (15.80) 18.50 23.47 18.66 19.69 19.33 18.19 Yeees!! I'm very happy with this average, only one horrible solve. It isn't rolling average. First twelve solves today. :-) | 20080227 |
| 4 | 22.55 seconds | Gavin Nelson | Great Average! 2 sub 20's and I think 5-6 of them had parity | 20080729 |
| 5 | 24.43 seconds | Michael Fung | 22.94 28.13 27.07 (20.00) 27.06 21.90 20.01 (33.30) 25.30 20.24 27.63 24.06 Timed with 'The ultimate Rubik's cubeŽ timer version 2.1'. I did this one day before the Belgian Open 2006. I think I had about two or three extremely easy edge permutations. But two days earlier I had also a 25.49 avg (I think this avg hadn't extremely many very easy EP's, although I am not very sure). I decided not to post this avg yet, because I didn't want to motivate Lars extra voor the Belgian Open :p. Unfortunately I couldn't handle with the pressure during the Belgian Open :( (also because it was 'mean of 3', so I couldn't permit any mistakes or bad solves). For the square-1 I (should) know all the 99 EP's and I also know for every shape a solution with the minimum amount of twists. | 20060506 |
| 6 | 24.87 seconds | Lars Vandenbergh | 24.64 20.03 (17.34) (31.95) 28.25 27.31 27.58 27.85 22.18 23.03 27.06 20.78 | 20070808 |
| 7 | 27.21 seconds | Michal Robaczyk | (19.43) 31.27 22.36 29.97 27.55 30.66 28.68 31.31 21.56 23.97 (47.25) 24.77 | 20070713 |
| 8 | 27.72 seconds | Bernett Orlando | 27.70 31.08 (43.38) 26.06 (18.27) 37.91 32.02 23.72 20.13 30.09 21.84 = 27.72 sec I am delighted. All the solves are 40 moves scrambling algm from Mr.Jaap site. | 20071001 |
| 9 | 27.77 seconds | Dan Cohen | (21.81) 26.5 23.34 28.77 24.75 (44.78) 28.53 24.38 27.11 28.83 31.31 34.21 Just loosened my sq-1 a little. Had a couple of parity solves in there but got pretty lucky with those. | 20080607 |
| 10 | 28.55 seconds | Milán Baticz | Solves without parity: 23.73, 20.28, (19.82), 25.58, 22.68, 27.28, 24.71. Solves with parity: 32.30, 34.37, 41.79, 47.37, 32.79. My parity algs are very slow. I use only 4 algs for the edges at the end of the solve. Practice, practise, practise. | 20070529 |
| 11 | 28.56 seconds | Choi Go-Ho | 23.36 24.55 28.53 24.08 32.08 31.05 28.50 38.86 28.48 26.08 (17.05) (40.33) | 20070802 |
| 12 | 30.91 seconds | Ben King | (9.28) 36.19 28.07 31.52 35.42 27.19 26.25 31.86 (40.43) 39.11 27.08 26.36 The scramble for the 9.28: 0,6/0,3/-5,3/5,5/-2,3/-3,3/0,3/6,3/-3,3/6,3/3,3/6,0/6,3/6,3/0,3/ It WAS completely random! KamscRcc | 20060626 |
| 13 | 35.25 seconds | Jason Baum | 28.00 39.58 34.91 35.28 37.64 (25.52) (44.47) 28.66 39.41 37.67 36.78 34.61 I started practicing this again. I need to learn more algs. | 20080523 |
| 14 | 35.47 seconds | Trevor Davila | 26.94 31.94 43.61 36.28 30.98 29.52 44.00 38.45 41.78 (46.92) 31.17 (26.00) Cubestation YouTube | 20070809 |
| 15 | 37.73 seconds | Evan Ralston | n/a | 20080519 |
| 16 | 39.33 seconds | Derrick Eide | 32.25 44.70 (1:02.84) 33.35 49.02 35.94 31.54 43.86 47.24 31.37 (30.03) 44.01 YAY! | 20080423 |
| 17 | 39.86 seconds | Joël Heymbeeck | 47.31 (22.69) 38.58 43.25 38.75 43.32 41.38 33.38 (47.73) 32.89 I can't believe it. I haven't touched my square-1 since Dutch Open and decide, 3 days before Belgian Open, to train a little bit. After a few solves, I take this average. Personal best average and personal best non-lucky solve :D 22.69 was not lucky (just too easy, 4 moves for square form and easy algo for each steps), 33.38 was lucky and I had a pop during EP of the 47.73 | 20070222 |
| 18 | 43.91 seconds | Syoji Takamatsu | 46.79 48.96 40.77 49.40 33.78 40.03 (76.89) (31.28) 46.85 48.21 50.12 34.18 I spent much time on an training this week. My site | 20060817 |
| 19 | 44.73 seconds | Edouard Chambon | Done 2 months before the WC 2005. I wanted to beat Lars in the WC but i realize that it was very hard. I gave up to continue the cube 3x3x3. I've just one thing to say : Congratulations Lars !! | 20051110 |
| 20 | 46.96 seconds | Pedro Santos | (37.99) 48.84 45.92 (1:05.20) 50.14 39.19 38.08 50.59 43.60 54.69 46.57 51.40. Wow! Just wow! This is more than 7 seconds better than my last one! :o Video of the 37.99 at my youtube channel -> http://www.youtube.com/user/PedroSG | 20080208 |
| 21 | 47.10 seconds | Marc van Beest | 42.16 53.78 31.69 (29.14) 45.52 36.03 1:01.05 (1:11.25) 36.02 1:00.61 47.27 56.91 SD=10.69 Very nice avg. Done after 21 days of squaring. The 31.69 and the 29.14 were lucky: no CP. The other sub 40's had easy shapes. With the 1:11.25 I messed up the shape during the solve, so I had to start all over again. | 20061229 |
| 22 | 50.77 seconds | Emile Compion | 53.56 45.08 1:02.25 39.75 52.76 48.34 (1:09.73) 52.72 57.31 (36.20) 45.50 50.47 Some very fast times for me :) | 20080331 |
| 23 | 55.26 seconds | Ouyang Yunqi | n/a | 20080515 |
| 24 | 55.80 seconds | Tatsuya Ookubo | 49.93 54.70 66.62 (39.56) 50.89 57.84 55.65 49.34 41.66 (67.90) 64.06 67.34 | 20060930 |
| 25 | 58.78 seconds | Tim Reynolds | 50.81 1:01.49 1:00.04 (28.93) 57.72 1:11.02 1:03.26 59.04 (1:46.44) 54.08 49.27 1:00.91 The 1:46 it took me a minute to get to cube shape, and I'm really not sure why--usually it takes me about 10-15 seconds. The 28 is non-lucky. It's only January 5th and my first 2007 goal is complete, which is a sub-1 average. Woo! | 20070106 |
| 26 | 1 minute 1.39 seconds | Suteerapon Hung | n/a | 20080408 |
| 27 | 1 minute 9.16 seconds | Emerson Herrmann | only been doing square-1 for a week, hope to do good at my next competition! | 20080802 |
| 28 | 1 minute 11.1 seconds | Mike Godfrey | 58 74 72 63 (90) 61 69 76 84 (53) 77 72 => 70.6 + 0.5 | |
| 29 | 1 minute 23.37 seconds | Doug Li | 1:04.29 2:01.84 1:15.27 0:56.40 (2:06.43) 2:02.53 0:46.01 2:02.79 0:57.46 (0:44.87) 1:44.65 1:02.44 | 20070209 |
| 30 | 1 minute 33.56 seconds | Arthur Adams | 1:36.46 1:20.56 1:36.40 1:46.42 1:57.82 1:13.05 (54.11) 1:12.11 (3:19.79) 1:37.00 1:34.10 1:41.72 Preparation for EPGY I suppose. | 20080207 |
| 31 | 1 minute 40.1 seconds | Ron van Bruchem | 95 102 (122) 91 (85) 102 91 97 95 111 102 110 => 99.6 + 0.5 I use a simple system with 3 sequences. | |
| 32 | 1 minute 42.32 seconds | Yeom Seok Hoon | 1:58.36 (2:12.47) 1:51.44 1:19.42 1:51.11 2:08.25 1:28.70 (1:09.09) 1:11.84 2:05.45 1:29.19 1:39.46 I'm Korean cubist. No lucky. | 20040611 |
| 33 | 1 minute 54.31 seconds | Bob Burton | 1:56.19 1:51.46 (1:20.89) 1:57.22 2:10.73 2:00.90 1:31.45 (2:17.24) 1:35.11 1:41.22 2:09.70 2:09.17 I can do better now. Visit my site. | 20060608 |
| 34 | 2 minutes 2.40 seconds | Mike Tryczak | Like Chris I have developed my own method as I have for every puzzle I own. Not a bad solution if I do say so myself. {1:50,1:46,2:02,1:50,2:26,(2:46),2:15,2:18,2:01,1:59,(1:29),1:52}=2:01.9+.5=2:02.40 | |
| 35 | 2 minutes 8.8 seconds | Katsuyuki Konishi | { 2:08,1:39,1: 32,1:42, (0:31), (4:49), 2:46,2:43,4: 01,2:18,0:59,1: 32} = 2 minutes 08 seconds +0.5 | |
| 36 | 2 minutes 26.17 seconds | Chris Hardwick | 1:47.82 (1:45.44) 2:34.08 3:02.13 2:19.86 (3:03.50) 2:35.68 2:07.27 2:38.20 2:18.79 2:58.00 1:59.89 I don't have an efficient way of fixing the parity error when it comes up, so I need to work on that. I still don't see how you guys get so fast! |