Place | Result | Name | Quote | Date |
1 | 9 minutes 48.88 seconds | Michal Halczuk | This is my first try.Sub 9 minutes is possible. | 20081112 |
2 | 11 minutes 37.95 seconds | Michael Gottlieb | Yeah, sub-12! Pretty good solves overall, 4x4 and 6x6 together had only one parity. Team # rules! | 20080806 |
3 | 11 minutes 56.76 seconds | Olivér Perge | Wow! What just happened?! Everything went really good! I am very happy and i don't think i'll ever go under 12 minutes again. Times in order: 2x2x2: 3.73 (PLL skip) 3x3x3: 17.52 7x7x7: 4:55.76 6x6x6: 3:29 (no Martini) 5x5x5: 2:00.70 4x4x4: 1:09.76 (PLL parity) | 20090510 |
4 | 12 minutes 13.67 seconds | Frank Morris | Been a while since I tried this. I'll try is again some other time. | 20081119 |
5 | 14 minutes 41.52 seconds | Jack Moseley | Fairly average solves, except for 7x7 which was pretty slow. | 20080801 |
6 | 16 minutes 41.95 seconds | Emile Compion | First try at this :) | 20081116 |
7 | 17 minutes 36.21 seconds | Matthew Millard | Fastest Time so far. usually average 19-20 mins. | 20090106 |
8 | 22 minutes 46.28 seconds | Ouyang Yunqi | video herevideo | 20081102 |
9 | 28 minutes | Alex Ellis | First try. 7x7 is insanely slow but had a decent 6 and 5. Had parity on the 4, 5, and 7. | 20080808 |